Aller au contenu
  • Home
  • Teams
    • All lawyers
    • Employment law
    • Company and association law
    • Economic and commercial law
    • Banking and financial law
    • Real estate law
    • Public and administrative law
    • Liability and insurance law
    • Health law, financial criminal law, disciplinary law
    • Support
  • News
  • Events
  • Contact
Menu
  • Home
  • Teams
    • All lawyers
    • Employment law
    • Company and association law
    • Economic and commercial law
    • Banking and financial law
    • Real estate law
    • Public and administrative law
    • Liability and insurance law
    • Health law, financial criminal law, disciplinary law
    • Support
  • News
  • Events
  • Contact
  • en_GBEN
    • fr_FRFR
    • nl_NLNL
  • en_GBEN
    • fr_FRFR
    • nl_NLNL
  • Home
  • Team
    • All lawyers
    • Employment law
    • Company and association law
    • Economic and commercial law
    • Banking and financial law
    • Real estate law
    • Public and administrative law
    • Liability and insurance law
    • Health law, financial criminal law, disciplinary law
    • Support
  • News
  • Events
  • Contact
  • en_GBEN
    • fr_FRFR
    • nl_NLNL
Menu
  • Home
  • Team
    • All lawyers
    • Employment law
    • Company and association law
    • Economic and commercial law
    • Banking and financial law
    • Real estate law
    • Public and administrative law
    • Liability and insurance law
    • Health law, financial criminal law, disciplinary law
    • Support
  • News
  • Events
  • Contact
  • en_GBEN
    • fr_FRFR
    • nl_NLNL

General anti-Covid measures banning demonstrations for a considerable period of time are contrary to the freedom of assembly and association

News
26 JUNE 2022

Public and administrative law

Context

In the case of Communauté genevoise d'action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights ( The Court "The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has had occasion to rule on the compatibility of certain measures to combat the coronavirus with Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter " the Convention ") which enshrines freedom of assembly and association.

 

Facts

As part of the fight against the spread of the COVID-19 virus, the Swiss government adopted the ordinance "O.2 Covid 19" which, among other things, prohibits public or private demonstrations and limits gatherings to a maximum of 5 people in public areas. While the possibility of obtaining an exemption for demonstrations aimed at exercising political rights was initially enshrined, it was excluded as of 16 March 2020.

These prohibitions are accompanied by a criminal sanction involving deprivation of liberty or a fine.

The applicant is an association whose statutory aim is to defend the interests of workers and its member organisations, particularly in the field of democratic freedoms. In its application, the applicant association alleges a violation of the Convention in that it has been deprived of the right to organise and take part in public meetings.

 

Decision of the Court

 On the merits, the Court notes first of all that the prohibition on public meetings, which was part of the measures taken by the Government to combat the coronavirus, constitutes an interference with the applicant's right to freedom of assembly, as guaranteed by Article 11§1er of the Convention.

The Court then examines the justification for this interference.

As regards the legal basis, the Court considers that there is a sufficient legal basis for the interference.

With regard to the legitimate aimThe Court accepted the Government's argument that the measures at issue pursued legitimate aims within the meaning of Article 11§2 of the Convention, namely the protection of health and the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

With regard to the necessity in a democratic societyThe Court notes that a general prohibition of a certain conduct is a radical measure which requires a strong justification and a particularly serious review by the courts.

The Court observes that between 17 March and 30 May 2020, all the events by which the applicant association could have pursued its activities by virtue of its statutory aim were subject to a general ban.

However, in the Court's view, even assuming that a strong justification existed, namely the effective fight against the global pandemic of the coronavirus disease, it was found that no serious review by the courts, and in particular by the Federal Court, had taken place.

Thus, without denying the threat posed by the coronavirus to society and public health, the Court nevertheless considers, in the light of the importance of freedom of peaceful assembly in a democratic society, and in particular the general nature and considerably long duration of the ban on public demonstrations falling within the scope of the applicant association's activities, as well as the nature and severity of the penalties provided for, that the interference with the exercise of the rights protected by Article 11 was not proportionate to the aims pursued.

The Court finds a violation of Article 11 of the Convention.

 

Comments

The criteria used by the Court to find that the disputed measure was not proportionate

are worth noting:

 

  • The Court stresses the importance of freedom of peaceful assembly in a society

and puts this fundamental freedom back at the heart of the democratic debate;

 

  • The Court uses the criterion of judicial review, which must be available against measures taken by the executive. As Judge KRENC points out in his concurring opinion, access to independent and effective judicial review is a fundamental guarantee against the risk of excess and abuse, which can never be overlooked;

 

  • The Court stresses the disproportionality of the measure in view of its general nature and its considerably long duration;

 

  • The Court uses the criterion of the severity of the penalties for infringement. Where there is a restriction on freedom of association, the sanctions cannot be so severe as to have a deterrent effect on potential participants or groups wishing to organise such events.

 

The conclusion reached by Judge KRENC in his concurring opinion is worth reproducing:

 

" Faced with a situation as exceptional and uncertain as the Covid-19 pandemic, the task of the internal authorities, guarantors of public health, was considerably more complex, especially at the beginning of this pandemic, the extent and duration of which nobody could predict. This complexity must be taken into account when assessing decisions with the comfort of hindsight. However, this judgment sets out salutary guidelines that help to preserve my conception of the rule of law within the meaning of the Convention. The Court had a duty to recall them, on pain of failing in its task ".

 

Jean LAURENT and Charlotte VERRIER.

For more information, please contact Jean LAURENT (jean.laurent@cew-law.be), lawyer, CEW & Partners.

 

              

Written by

Jean Laurent

Partner
Linkedin-in
jean.laurent@cew-law.be
+32 (0)2 542 02 49
Public and administrative law

You will also like

News
26 MAY 2023

Town Planning Brussels - Retail in public amenity zones?

The PRAS reserves public interest or public service facility zones for buildings or installations that are in the public interest or...
READ MORE
Insights
22 MAY 2023

Speech by Marc-David Weinberger at the "Anti-Money Laundering - Compliance" conference on 22 May 2023

Marc-David Weinberger will be taking part in the Anti-Money Laundering - Compliance conference organised by the...
READ MORE

Do you have a question or need advice?

Contact us!

Contact us

Sectors

  • Inter-municipal public services
  • Hospitals and medical laboratories
  • Real estate
  • Aviation
  • Insurance
  • New technologies
  • Inter-municipal public services
  • Hospitals and medical laboratories
  • Real estate
  • Aviation
  • Insurance
  • New technologies

Teams

  • Lawyers
  • Employment law
  • Company and association law
  • Economic and commercial law
  • Banking and financial law
  • Real estate law
  • Public and administrative law
  • Liability and insurance law
  • Health law, financial criminal law, disciplinary law
  • Support
  • Lawyers
  • Employment law
  • Company and association law
  • Economic and commercial law
  • Banking and financial law
  • Real estate law
  • Public and administrative law
  • Liability and insurance law
  • Health law, financial criminal law, disciplinary law
  • Support

Contact

Avenue Louise 250
1050 Brussels
Belgium

+32 (0)2 534 20 20

info@cew-law.be

Follow us

Linkedin-in
  • Anti-money laundering
  • Conditions of intervention
  • Transparency of fees and charges
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie policy (EU)
  • Anti-money laundering
  • Conditions of intervention
  • Transparency of fees and charges
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie policy (EU)

Developed by Le Sidecar Web

Managing cookie consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies such as cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Failure to consent or withdraw consent may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The storage or technical access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. Technical storage or access which is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. In the absence of a subpoena, voluntary compliance by your internet service provider or additional third party records, the information stored or retrieved for this sole purpose generally cannot be used to identify you.
Marketing
The storage or technical access is necessary to create user profiles in order to send advertisements, or to track the user on a website or on several websites with similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}